Formating Barracuda under Solaris 2.5.1

My original question:

> I'm trying to format a 2.1Gb Seagate Barracuda (ST32171N) under Solaris

> 2.5.1 without any luck. The workstation is a Sparc10 with a Ross 125

> cpu, a SBus SFE FWSCSI card and 2 ST32171N (attached to mother board

> SCSI). I was able to install Solaris 2.5.1 on sd3 without any problem.

> But when it comes time to format sd1, format hangs at pass 0.

>

> I've installed the February 2.5.1_Recommended patch bundle.

>

> Any clues what is causing this or what patches might fix this.

Solution:

Changed the SCSI ID for the non-boot drive from 1 to 0 and swapped drive

bays for the disks (put the boot drive in bay disk0 and the non-boot drive

in bay disk1). I'm thinking it was solved by the SCSI ID change, rather

then swapping bays, but...

Thanks to:

Justin Young <justiny@cluster.engr.subr.edu>

FLOYD, RANDALL D. <FLOYDR@nebeng.otis.com>

Responses:

>Fromjustiny@cluster.engr.subr.edu Fri Apr 18 09:43:35 1997

>Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 19:33:10 -0500 (CDT)

>From: Justin Young <justiny@cluster.engr.subr.edu>

>To: Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>

>Subject: Re: Formating Barracuda under Solaris 2.5.1

>

>Sorry, Paul. The only advice I can give is to try SCSI id 0. (Unless

>you already have a drive at that #). I take it your controller is at

>#7.0

>

>I have two of those disks but they're on an ultra so that doesn't count.

>FromFLOYDR@nebeng.otis.com Fri Apr 18 09:43:45 1997

>Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:22:00 -0400

>From: "FLOYD, RANDALL D." <FLOYDR@nebeng.otis.com>

>To: Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>

>Subject: RE: Formating Barracuda under Solaris 2.5.1

>

>Paul,

>

>Have you seen the discussions on sunsolve.sun.com about problems with

>the Barracuda and Tagged Command Queuing? I have a new Ultra that came

>with the same hard drive you are talking about, and I had quite a few

>similar problems. My problems went away with experimenting with some

>scsi_options settings in the /etc/system file. I had varying results

>with the settings, but the ones that totally disabled tagged queuing

>seemed to have the most affect. The following section is a brief

>description of the settings I experimented with:

>

>To change to the slower asynchronous data rate, add the following line

>to /etc/system file:

>

> set scsi_options = 0x58 then reboot the system.

>

>To turn synchronous transfer back on at the highest possible speed

>without using tagged queueing, change the scsi_options line to:

>

> set scsi_options = 0X178

>

>To turn synchronous transfer back on at the highest possible speed

>allowing tagged queueing (if available in the operating system), change

>the scsi_options line to:

>

> set scsi_options = 0X1f8

>

>It's too bad that I didn't save some of the bug reports that I found

>concerning the Barracuda, but they made for some interesting reading.

>Apparently, more than an average number of people end up having to

>disable Tagged Queuing, but Seagate won't admit that a problem exists.

>Well, anyway, I hope this helps you out in some way.

______________________________________________________________________________

Paul Kanz

System Administrator

Interconnectix, Inc.

10220 SW Nimbus Ave, Building K4

Portland, OR 97223

Email: paul@icx.com

Phone: 503.684.6641

Fax: 503.639.3469

______________________________________________________________________________

[6158 byte] By [CodeProf.com] at [2007-12-25 10:09:00]
«« KSH
»» System Disk